<First paragraph skipped>

Nowadays, the options are seemingly endless for how we choose to watch TV. While terrestrial analog broadcasts still rule supreme, the onset of flat-screen and other high-definition TVs has spawned terrestrial digital broadcasts as well as BS (broadcasting satellite) and CS (commercial satellite) broadcasts via satellite.

1. I like your title and thanks for listening to my advice! However, I’m not sure I understand the last three words of your title. What did you mean by “until go final”?
   Did you mean until the game’s conclusion or until the end of the game?
   訳者注：“until the end of the game”のつもりだったのですが、韻を踏ませるためムリな訳でしたね。
2. non-CRT TVs → flat-screen TVs
   I wonder if it would be easier just to write, “flat-screen TVs”. I had to stop and think for a moment what non-CRT meant. My guess is “non cathode-ray tube” but many of your average readers aren’t going to know what that means.

1. ここの表現は少し変。dominant を用いるか、prevail を使いたければ the prevalent analog terrestrial broadcasting… といった形にする。
2. broadcasting を削除。

1. photographs (pl.)
2. 削除。
3. Very good

1. live が「生中継」という意味なら、録画したものも放送されるので不適当。
2. Images と複数に訂正。
3. once was に訂正。
4. which 節とせず、Analog Terrestrial Television Broadcasting の前に the widely used と形容する。
5. or を追加。

Amongst　all of these　viewing　options, hopes　are　high　that　terrestrial　digital broadcasting will become the standard flag bearer for TV viewing in the foreseeable future. Technically speaking, the frequencies assigned to one channel of a digital terrestrial broadcast are divided into 13 segments. 0f those 13 segments, 12 are allocated for TV viewing at home while the 13th segment has been set aside for mobile handsets. This new technology was initially planned to be called “One segment broadcasting", but ultimately it was tagged with the playful moniker “One Seg".

1. 12 segments → Twelve segments out of the 13 are…
   As a rule, if the first word of a sentence happens to be a number, always spell out the number rather than writing it in numeral form. “out of the 13 are allocated…”
2. Nice work in this paragraph.

1. scheme には「企み」というネガティブな意味があるので、design や plan を使った方が安全。

1. Technically speaking (alt.)

So, just how does “One Seg” differ from standard terrestrial analog TV? Although a number of mobile phones already come equipped with TV tuners, they only pick up analog broadcasts. What this means is that while one can enjoy a Red Sox game if stationary, when moving around the signal gets shaky, 1eading to a choppy picture with lots of static and fuzz, making the picture nearly unwatchable. Enter “One Seg”, a digital broadcast designed on the premise of watching TV while on the go. “One Seg” phones are enabled with error correction coding and other signal adjusting technologies that deliver a solid, steady picture that stays with your device wherever you go.

1. see differences → take a look at the difference
2. You handled the translation well but I’d be careful for that repeating sentence structure you use twice in that paragraph. Namely, the use of the semicolon followed by “however”. In a short paragraph, I’d want to avoid using the same grammatical style more than once.
3. acceptable → decent, watchableでもよい。
4. カンマを入れる。
5. high quality → high-quality（ハイフンを入れる）。

1. このような携帯が販売されたのはいつなのか？数年前？昨年？それとも今発売中？それによって表現も変わってくる。
2. あえて一人称を使ったことに興味がある。筆者自身が実際に視聴したと考えれば筋が通るが。ここはどう表現すべきか？
3. roaming を携帯電話業界のテクニカルタームと分かった上で使用したのだろうか？ただしこの文脈で roaming を使うとやや混乱を起こす可能性があるので、あとの文で使用している on the move/ on the go に統一したほうがよい。

1. このくだり、語順がおかしい。
   reception is often poor and unstable annoying the viewer with wavy or flickering pictures
2. Good, I like your different approaches towards 移動中.

1. lacking に変更。否定形を使うよりも、否定の意味の形容詞、例えば、lacking を使うほうが自然。
2. ここも否定形を使わずに、stationary または in a fixed location 等の肯定形のほうがよい。
3. 画質がよいことを表す形容詞にはもっとぴったりのものがある。例えば、crisp, sharp 等を使うこと。